CanShrink=True doesnt work

I have added to detail rows to my table and set the canshrink property to
them all to be =True.
I only use one field in each row, and if there is no value in that field you
would think it would shrink the whole row to nothing. It keeps the row
there and takes up the space of the whole row.
Has anyone else seen this or have any idea why CanShrink does not work.?Did you ever find a solution to this? I have the same problem. I have a
matrix control that has the potential to have four rows per group. However,
depending on the group I only want to show some rows and not others. I'm
able to hide the values in the rows, but I can't hide the row.
Thanks!
Ian

Cannot write a small row! Please help...

Hi everyone,
This is weird. Please help!
I have a long row in the form:
WordA WordB WordC WordD etc...
The above row is 5,294 bytes in size.
I got the soundex equivalent of this row. It now became:
SoundexA SoundexB SoundexC SoundexD etc...
It's size is now 2,898 bytes. AS you would expect as soundex returns a
4 letter code.
I attempt to write the soundex field to its place in the database. I
get the followign error message:
Cannot create a row of size 9602 which is greater than the allowable
maximum of 8060.
The statement has been terminated.
Now, I am totally confused - Does anyone know why this is happening?
Any ideas/suggestions/comments/diagnostics that I could run would be
great. Please help me!
Confused,
Al.Could it be that your possible row size is exceeded ? Not the actual
used one, but the highest possible. Therefore you should have gotten an
error while creating or altering the table once upon a time.
SELECT Sum(ISNULL(CHARACTER_MAXIMUM_LENGTH,length)) from
INFORMATION_SCHEMA.Columns col
INNER join systypes
on systypes.name = col.Data_type
Where table_name = 'YourTable'
HTH, jens Suessmeyer.|||Thanks jens,
I ran this cool command on my table and get the answer: 8392
Unfortunately I don't know where it is! Can you help me locate it or
suggest possible solutions? Can you recommend what I should do please?
Any assistance much appreciated.
Thank you,
Al.|||Sure, you should narrow down your datatypes that these fit on a
datapage of 8060 bytes. In some cases some columns use wasted datatypes
as somebody just assumes how many bytes are to go in that column. If
there is in some cases reengineering,l the people narrow down the
datatypes because they know the actual data size of the columns later.
Or you can split out the table to some "Soundex table" qwhich
references 1by1 the original table and just point with the same PK on
this.
HTH, jens Suessmeyer.

Cannot write a small row! Please help...

Hi everyone,
This is weird. Please help!
I have a long row in the form:
WordAWordBWordCWordD etc...
The above row is 5,294 bytes in size.
I got the soundex equivalent of this row. It now became:
SoundexASoundexBSoundexCSoundexD etc...
It's size is now 2,898 bytes. AS you would expect as soundex returns a
4 letter code.
I attempt to write the soundex field to its place in the database. I
get the followign error message:
Cannot create a row of size 9602 which is greater than the allowable
maximum of 8060.
The statement has been terminated.
Now, I am totally confused - Does anyone know why this is happening?
Any ideas/suggestions/comments/diagnostics that I could run would be
great. Please help me!
Confused,
Al.
Could it be that your possible row size is exceeded ? Not the actual
used one, but the highest possible. Therefore you should have gotten an
error while creating or altering the table once upon a time.
SELECT Sum(ISNULL(CHARACTER_MAXIMUM_LENGTH,length)) from
INFORMATION_SCHEMA.Columns col
INNER join systypes
on systypes.name = col.Data_type
Where table_name = 'YourTable'
HTH, jens Suessmeyer.
|||Thanks jens,
I ran this cool command on my table and get the answer: 8392
Unfortunately I don't know where it is! Can you help me locate it or
suggest possible solutions? Can you recommend what I should do please?
Any assistance much appreciated.
Thank you,
Al.
|||Sure, you should narrow down your datatypes that these fit on a
datapage of 8060 bytes. In some cases some columns use wasted datatypes
as somebody just assumes how many bytes are to go in that column. If
there is in some cases reengineering,l the people narrow down the
datatypes because they know the actual data size of the columns later.
Or you can split out the table to some "Soundex table" qwhich
references 1by1 the original table and just point with the same PK on
this.
HTH, jens Suessmeyer.

Cannot write a small row! Please help...

Hi everyone,
This is weird. Please help!
I have a long row in the form:
WordA WordB WordC WordD etc...
The above row is 5,294 bytes in size.
I got the soundex equivalent of this row. It now became:
SoundexA SoundexB SoundexC SoundexD etc...
It's size is now 2,898 bytes. AS you would expect as soundex returns a
4 letter code.
I attempt to write the soundex field to its place in the database. I
get the followign error message:
Cannot create a row of size 9602 which is greater than the allowable
maximum of 8060.
The statement has been terminated.
Now, I am totally confused - Does anyone know why this is happening?
Any ideas/suggestions/comments/diagnostics that I could run would be
great. Please help me!
Confused,
Al.Could it be that your possible row size is exceeded ? Not the actual
used one, but the highest possible. Therefore you should have gotten an
error while creating or altering the table once upon a time.
SELECT Sum(ISNULL(CHARACTER_MAXIMUM_LENGTH,leng
th)) from
INFORMATION_SCHEMA.Columns col
INNER join systypes
on systypes.name = col.Data_type
Where table_name = 'YourTable'
HTH, jens Suessmeyer.|||Thanks jens,
I ran this cool command on my table and get the answer: 8392
Unfortunately I don't know where it is! Can you help me locate it or
suggest possible solutions? Can you recommend what I should do please?
Any assistance much appreciated.
Thank you,
Al.|||Sure, you should narrow down your datatypes that these fit on a
datapage of 8060 bytes. In some cases some columns use wasted datatypes
as somebody just assumes how many bytes are to go in that column. If
there is in some cases reengineering,l the people narrow down the
datatypes because they know the actual data size of the columns later.
Or you can split out the table to some "Soundex table" qwhich
references 1by1 the original table and just point with the same PK on
this.
HTH, jens Suessmeyer.

Cannot update record through vb or Enterprise manager

When trying to update a specific row in a table an error
occurs.
[Microsoft][ODBC SQL SERVER DRIVER][SQL SERVER]
SQLDumExceptionhandler. Process 51 generated fatal
exception c0000005 ACCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION. SQL Server
is terminating this process.
What could be the reason for this? There are no relations
hips or constraints on and between any tables.What build of SQL Server is it ? Would suggest
I would run DBCC CHECKDB to check for corruption / specifically DBCC
CHECKTABLE on the table being queried
I would then look at the last SQL Server Errorlog when it happened and see
if there are any matches on http://www.microsoft.com/support for kb's that
have a similar pattern ie on the Short Stack Dump info reported. Below is
an example - so if you had this output I would search the kb and google
(groups and web) for Fill6Xdata . Be aware that some of the function calls
are quite generic so watch out for false positives.
Ideally you should open a case with PSS
-
Short Stack Dump
0069EF5F Module(sqlservr+0029EF5F) (Fill6xData(unsigned char *,class
CXVariant *,class CTypeInfo const *,unsigned long *)+0000009A)
0069BEDE Module(sqlservr+0029BEDE) (intnl_paramdata(struct srv_proc
*,int)+000000DB)
regards,
Andy.
"John" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:249c701c46020$9cdb8a70$a601280a@.phx
.gbl...
> When trying to update a specific row in a table an error
> occurs.
> [Microsoft][ODBC SQL SERVER DRIVER][SQL SERVER]
> SQLDumExceptionhandler. Process 51 generated fatal
> exception c0000005 ACCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION. SQL Server
> is terminating this process.
> What could be the reason for this? There are no relations
> hips or constraints on and between any tables.

Cannot update record through vb or Enterprise manager

When trying to update a specific row in a table an error
occurs.
[Microsoft][ODBC SQL SERVER DRIVER][SQL SERVER]
SQLDumExceptionhandler. Process 51 generated fatal
exception c0000005 ACCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION. SQL Server
is terminating this process.
What could be the reason for this? There are no relations
hips or constraints on and between any tables.
What build of SQL Server is it ? Would suggest
I would run DBCC CHECKDB to check for corruption / specifically DBCC
CHECKTABLE on the table being queried
I would then look at the last SQL Server Errorlog when it happened and see
if there are any matches on http://www.microsoft.com/support for kb's that
have a similar pattern ie on the Short Stack Dump info reported. Below is
an example - so if you had this output I would search the kb and google
(groups and web) for Fill6Xdata . Be aware that some of the function calls
are quite generic so watch out for false positives.
Ideally you should open a case with PSS
-
Short Stack Dump
0069EF5F Module(sqlservr+0029EF5F) (Fill6xData(unsigned char *,class
CXVariant *,class CTypeInfo const *,unsigned long *)+0000009A)
0069BEDE Module(sqlservr+0029BEDE) (intnl_paramdata(struct srv_proc
*,int)+000000DB)
regards,
Andy.
"John" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:249c701c46020$9cdb8a70$a601280a@.phx.gbl...
> When trying to update a specific row in a table an error
> occurs.
> [Microsoft][ODBC SQL SERVER DRIVER][SQL SERVER]
> SQLDumExceptionhandler. Process 51 generated fatal
> exception c0000005 ACCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION. SQL Server
> is terminating this process.
> What could be the reason for this? There are no relations
> hips or constraints on and between any tables.

Cannot sort a row which is greater than 8094?

I've recently started getting the following error when I retrieve
long text entries from my MS SQL Server database...
"Cannot sort a row of size 8150, which is greater than the allowable
maximum of 8094"
I have one column in one of the tables involved in the SELECT statement
that has a maximum of 8000 characters.
Should I resize this column to 7800 or similar, to avoid this problem,
or should I modify my SELECT statement to ignore the errors and proceed
as normal?
Thanks.
--
fiddlewidawiddumInformation from the SQL Server Books Onine (SELECT, ORDER BY clause):
There is no limit to the number of items in the ORDER BY clause. However,
there is a limit of 8,060 bytes for the row size of intermediate worktables
needed for sort operations. This limits the total size of columns specified
in an ORDER BY clause.
You should set the column width accordingly.
Martin C K Poon
Senior Analyst Programmer
====================================
"Stimp" <ren@.spumco.com> bl
news:slrne3u0f8.vf.ren@.carbon.redbrick.dcu.ie g...
> I've recently started getting the following error when I retrieve
> long text entries from my MS SQL Server database...
> "Cannot sort a row of size 8150, which is greater than the allowable
> maximum of 8094"
> I have one column in one of the tables involved in the SELECT statement
> that has a maximum of 8000 characters.
> Should I resize this column to 7800 or similar, to avoid this problem,
> or should I modify my SELECT statement to ignore the errors and proceed
> as normal?
> Thanks.
> --
> fiddlewidawiddum|||Do you have to order by the full length of 8000 character column? Maybe
left(<colum>, 2000)
could be just fine.
ML
http://milambda.blogspot.com/|||On Fri, 14 Apr 2006 ML <ML@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
> Do you have to order by the full length of 8000 character column? Maybe
> left(<colum>, 2000)
I order by the unique identifier column... not the varchar column.
I get the impression that the SELECT statement is pulling back several
rows (including the 8000 character one) before it sorts through them and
so gives me this error if the 8000 character column is filled to its
maximum capacity AND another varchar column (which is included in
the SELECT statement) has more than 94 chars.
fiddlewidawiddum|||Well, post the query then, so we can have a look.
Sorting is done implicitly by the Query Optimizer when GROUP BY or DISTINCT
is used in the query.
ML
http://milambda.blogspot.com/|||On Fri, 14 Apr 2006 ML <ML@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
> Well, post the query then, so we can have a look.
> Sorting is done implicitly by the Query Optimizer when GROUP BY or DISTINC
T
> is used in the query.
SELECT TOP 6 d.EntryTitle, d.EntryText, d.EntryDate, l.LocName, c.CountryNam
e
FROM Diary d, Location l, Country c
WHERE d.idLocation = l.idLocation AND
d.idCountry = c.idCountry
ORDER BY d.idDiary desc
EntryTitle is 255 chars long (although I'll probably resize this to 65)
EntryText was 8000 chars long, but I've since resized it to 7900
fiddlewidawiddum|||Judging by the simplicity of the query, I guess the problem originates in th
e
execution plan. Try this:
SELECT TOP 6 d.EntryTitle, d.EntryText, d.EntryDate, l.LocName, c.CountryNam
e
FROM Diary d
inner join Location l on d.idLocation = l.idLocation
inner join Country c on d.idCountry = c.idCountry
ORDER BY d.idDiary desc
Here I've used the contemporary join syntax that may help the Query
Optimizer to build a different execution plan.
ML
http://milambda.blogspot.com/|||On Fri, 14 Apr 2006 ML <ML@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
> Judging by the simplicity of the query, I guess the problem originates in
the
> execution plan. Try this:
> SELECT TOP 6 d.EntryTitle, d.EntryText, d.EntryDate, l.LocName, c.CountryN
ame
> FROM Diary d
> inner join Location l on d.idLocation = l.idLocation
> inner join Country c on d.idCountry = c.idCountry
> ORDER BY d.idDiary desc
> Here I've used the contemporary join syntax that may help the Query
> Optimizer to build a different execution plan.
hmm, I assumed that my query would work in a similar way to having
JOINS.
I'll try that if the error crops up again (it's since disappeared once
I resized the column to 7900 and trimmed a few rows that had entries >
7900).
cheers!
--
fiddlewidawiddum|||You could try adding the ROBUST PLAN hint and see if it helps.
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
Blog: http://solidqualitylearning.com/blogs/tibor/
"Stimp" <ren@.spumco.com> wrote in message news:slrne3u0f8.vf.ren@.carbon.redbrick.dcu.ie...[
color=darkred]
> I've recently started getting the following error when I retrieve
> long text entries from my MS SQL Server database...
> "Cannot sort a row of size 8150, which is greater than the allowable
> maximum of 8094"
> I have one column in one of the tables involved in the SELECT statement
> that has a maximum of 8000 characters.
> Should I resize this column to 7800 or similar, to avoid this problem,
> or should I modify my SELECT statement to ignore the errors and proceed
> as normal?
> Thanks.
> --
> fiddlewidawiddum[/color]

Cannot sort a row of size 9966, which is greater than the allowable maximum of 8094.

I understand I received this error because of the SQL Server row-size
limit, but I'm not sure how to fix it. The report query joins three
tables, and brings data from those tables. The problem is each table
has a Notes varchar(7800) field. If I comment out all notes field then
the query runs fine. Any ideas on how report needs to designed so that
all data can be shown?
Query to pull data from each table runs fine, I was wondering if I
should split the query into three queries, and then create a report
with two nested sub reports pulling data from each table. Before I go
down this path, if you have any suggestions or have implemented similar
solutions please share your thoughts.
Thanks
YogeshYou could use a convert and convert the the field to a smaller varchar.
Perhaps enough for them to see some of the note and then use drill through
to allow them to pull up another report that shows the notes for the current
record (search BOL for drill through).
Bruce Loehle-Conger
MVP SQL Server Reporting Services
"Yogesh" <yogeshprabhu@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1124397578.652639.273140@.g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>I understand I received this error because of the SQL Server row-size
> limit, but I'm not sure how to fix it. The report query joins three
> tables, and brings data from those tables. The problem is each table
> has a Notes varchar(7800) field. If I comment out all notes field then
> the query runs fine. Any ideas on how report needs to designed so that
> all data can be shown?
> Query to pull data from each table runs fine, I was wondering if I
> should split the query into three queries, and then create a report
> with two nested sub reports pulling data from each table. Before I go
> down this path, if you have any suggestions or have implemented similar
> solutions please share your thoughts.
> Thanks
> Yogesh
>

Cannot sort a row of size 8095, which is greater than the allowable maximum of 8094

Hello,
I receive an error "Cannot sort a row of size 8095, which is greater than
the allowable maximum of 8094." when selecting values from a table in the
database. If I delete the existing data and try it, I'm not able to
reproduce it again. I wonder how could this error have possibly occured in
the first place. Any ideas?
Thanks,
Felix.JHi, Felix
Try running your query with "OPTION (ROBUST PLAN)".
Razvan|||Felix,
I also encountered this problem.
Have you tried the OPTION (ROBUST PLAN)? Does it work?
Julius

Cannot sort a row

i encounter this error..
Cannot sort a row of size 8107, which is greater than the allowable maximum
of 8094.?
why this error occur? can someone explain? how to avoid this? thanks!!i encounter this error..

Cannot sort a row of size 8107, which is greater than the allowable maximum
of 8094.?

why this error occur? can someone explain? how to avoid this? thanks!!

see this ...Link (http://www.sqlteam.com/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=58825)